As my year in London continued to unfold at
a rapid pace, my own heightened sensitivity and curiosity concerning my feelings
of attachment to this city did not change. I have since read that this urge to
wrap one’s head around their feelings in place is human nature. Human beings
‘have an emotional need to identify with personal and intimate places, and
hence ‘construct’ these places for themselves on the basis of repeated
experiences’ (Holloway and Hubbard, 2001, p. 75). It was a curiosity resulting
from such experiences that encouraged me to begin the search for some of the
more tangible factors contributing to these feelings as well as others who may share
my experiences.
I called those similar to myself,
‘In-betweeners’. They were people new to London but neither tourist nor
resident. With this community, I
was hoping to generate a shared knowledge, comparing feelings of our time in
the city, while also expanding my own London footprint. The project began with
an evening of discussion surrounding our experiences in London. This dialogue
became a starting point in a collaboration amongst members of a similar
community. I hoped the experience would be enriching for all of us, but was
confident that it was particular to the group, and specifically for the group. Annette
Krauss is an artist with a similar interest in informal and unrecognized
knowledge, while challenging the tensions between the themes of place and
belonging. In her project, ‘Hidden Curriculum’ she brings forth the hidden
lessons that students acquired in schools, that were perhaps unintended. Krauss
notes that a hidden curriculum can be found alongside any learning experience both
within, and outside of the school environment (The Showroom, 2012).
Following the evening of discussion, the
group agreed to a series of neighbourhood walks, sharing each in-betweener’s
meaningful places, and ‘lived space’. We focused on places of belonging or
disbelonging. These were places where memorable moments have taken place;
relationships have been impacted, or quite simply comfortable spaces that are
part of the in-betweener’s lived routine. ‘Their London’ is limited to their
experience and continues to grow as their ‘lived space’ expands. Also exploring
the relationship between place and belonging, The Richgate Project (2007) similarly used walking as a means of
creating a ‘symbolic mapping experience’ with its participants (Irwin, et al.,
2009, p. 64). The artists collaborating on this project suggested that when
walking was integrated into the process of mapping, “cartography shifts from
being a ‘point’ or fixed location to an encounter between people and places” (Irwin,
et al., 2009, p. 64). Like The Richgate Project
(2007), the stories associated with these places of meaning began to
explain any feelings of attachment or disbelonging in this city.
I photographed the neighbourhood visits, recording
the pictures on instagram, with the hopes that in-betweeners (old and new)
could continue to add to this growing visual collection of their London. Using
photographs, Stephen Willat takes a similar approach by visually mapping
relationships, and ties to place. Willat’s work explores the nature of human
interaction, and the connection between individuals and communities. In his
show, The Oxford Community Datastream (2013), Willat uses photography and mixed
media to make a visual diagram of relationships for the viewers. Using a
similar approach, my intention was to diagram the in-betweener’s experience by
visually mapping it for the viewer.
While the map shows what the in-betweener’s
London looks like, I compiled ‘The Inbetweener’s Guide to London’ to put into
words how their London feels. The book contains helpful tidbits of information,
maps, and places that the in-betweener’s have enjoyed, while also telling the
story of unique experiences that future in-betweeners may be able to relate to.
Each in-betweener’s perceptions on belonging and disbelonging in London are
documented, as well as specific spots that have had an impact on their lives.
Some of these places had meanings deeper than others, but every spot had
personal significance to the person who took me there. The book was created by
hand as a resource for in-betweeners with knowledge from in-betweeners. Despite the stigma often surrounding
craft-based work in the world of contemporary art, I felt strongly that the
handmade approach to the book’s construction symbolizes a genuine sincerity in
the sharing of information. Contemporary artist, Emma Smith created Ideas on Travel: Nottingham (2006) using
a similar approach. To create her book, Smith collaborated with Londoners,
compiling hand drawn maps and words of advice on travelling to Nottingham. When
speaking of the relevance of craft in the contemporary art world, David Revere
McFadden (Chief curator and vice president, Museum of Arts & Design, New
York) says,
'Craft, art, and design are words
heavily laden with cultural baggage. For me, they all connote the profound
engagement with materials and process that is central to creativity. Through
this engagement, form, function, and meaning are made tangible.’
(The
Victoria and Albert Museum, 2013).
Mark Jones, (Director of the Victoria &
Albert Museum 2001-2011) echoes McFadden’s sediments, saying, ‘Craft is
remembering that art is seen, felt and heard as well as understood, knowing
that not all ideas start with words, thinking with hands as well as head.’ (The
Victoira and Albert Museum, 2013).
It was in speaking with the in-betweeners
in their neighbourhoods that the ever-evolving relationship between place and
belonging became very apparent. It was the little signs of belonging to this
new environment that seemed to hold the most meaning. It became clear on my
walkabouts, that many of us had not been in the city long enough to have
experienced significant moments, which would result in a true attachment to the city. The term in-betweeners infers a sense
of disbelonging, being neither here nor there. We weren’t ‘there’ and only time
and lived experience would help us get ‘there’. The Phenomonologists believed
there was ‘no separate real world external to human experience’ (Holloway and
Hubbard, 2001, p. 70). An individual’s ‘activity space’ plays a huge role in
sense of belonging, as the more one is able to encounter a place, the more they
invest in it, making the place, ‘an extension of the individual’ (Holloway and
Hubbard, 1988, p. 75). This links closely to Bourdieu’s concept of Habitus. Hillier
and Rooksby best define Habitus as, ‘a sense of one’s (and others’) place and
role in the world and one’s lived environment’ (2005, p. 21). Our daily actions, decisions, and
lifestyle choices are governed through our experiences of everyday life. Bourdieu’s
habitus helps to explain the different perceptions, emotions, and feelings felt
by each of the in-betweeners. Each in-betweener’s perception of this city and
their own sense of belonging are slightly different, and a product of their own
history.
My hope was to create an experience unique to in-betweeners, by
in-betweeners. It is my intention that this project does not end with me. I
intend to leave the guide in London to circulate amongst new in-betweeners,
growing with their experiences and newly formed knowledge in this city. Within
the gallery setting, I intend the guide book and visual map to be seen as one
event, both pieces intersecting with each other, while also intertwined with
the memories and lived experiences that both the viewers and in-betweeners
bring to the encounter.
I'd love to hear your thoughts. I will also post some of the pieces of the other students at a later date.
